|
Geomechanical factors affecting the installation and stability of a surface... |
|
|
|
|
Geomechanical factors affecting the installation and stability of a surface goaf well at a deep UK coal mine Authors: D. N. Whittles, I.S. Lowndes, S.W. Kingman, C. Yates, S. Jobling
This paper describes a three dimensional computational modelling study undertaken to investigate theeffects that the geomechanical stress and strain fi elds produced by deep longwall mining operations mayhave on the installation and long term stability of a vertical, surface to goaf, gas drainage well installed within a deep UK coal mine. The modelling programme consisted of the investigation of two modelling scenarios. The fi rst scenario represented the installation of the well, close to the face line of an active longwall coal face, during the early production life of the panel. The second scenario represented the installation of the well at a position behind the coal face, and over the goaf, once the panel had retreated some distance back from the face start line. An analytical method to predict the infl uence that the developed shear strains within the rock mass may have on the subsequent stability of the well casing has been developed and its derivation given. From an analysis of the results produced by these geomechanical models it was concluded that the well was infl uenced by the geomechanical behaviour of the longwall panel at two distinct stages, namely, during the installation of the well and during the subsequent stages of the retreat of the panel. The geomechanical models predicted that during the installation phase, the surface goaf wells would encounter broken ground at heights of between 30 to 75 metres above the worked horizon. It was found that the long term stability of the well was signifi cantly infl uenced by the position of the well in relation to the face line at the time of installation. The modelling showed that a well installed close to an active longwall face during the early development phases of a panel would experience signifi cantly more strain and hence potential predicted damage during subsequent panel extraction than a well installed behind the face line directly over the goaf. The results of the modelling aided in the design of the well by allowing the correct depth of installation of the well casing to be determined. Keywords: goaf wells, three dimensional modelling, gas drainage |